<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									CJC-1295 No DAC Lab Results - Peptide Hubs				            </title>
            <link>https://www.azsteroids.net/lab-testing-peptide-hubs/cjc-1295-no-dac</link>
            <description>Join our anabolic steroid forum for discussion about steroid sources, bodybuilding cycles, PCT, training and nutrition. Real user experiences and community advice.</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 02:48:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>CJC-1295 No DAC Lab Results</title>
                        <link>https://www.azsteroids.net/lab-testing-peptide-hubs/cjc-1295-no-dac#post-20090</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 09:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hey everyone,
Found a recent lab result for Peptide Hubs CJC-1295 No DAC and wanted to drop it here for anyone tracking their peptide line.This one wasn’t tested by me — it came from a thir...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everyone,</p>
<p>Found a recent <strong>lab result</strong> for <strong>Peptide Hubs CJC-1295 No DAC</strong> and wanted to drop it here for anyone tracking their peptide line.<br />This one wasn’t tested by me — it came from a third-party source that’s been running multiple peptide analyses lately (same group that tested their <a href="https://www.azsteroids.net/lab-testing-peptide-hubs/tirzepatide">Tirze-Pep</a> and <a href="https://www.azsteroids.net/lab-testing-peptide-hubs/nad-100-mg">NAD+</a>).</p>
<p><strong>Lab details:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Test date:</strong> 2025-09-29</li>
<li><strong>Label claim:</strong> 5 mg/vial</li>
<li><strong>Result:</strong> 4.78 mg</li>
<li><strong>Method:</strong> HPLC</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://www.azsteroids.net/wp-content/uploads/peptide-hubs/cjc-no-dac-lab-test-2025-09-29.webp" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://www.azsteroids.net/wp-content/uploads/peptide-hubs/cjc-no-dac-lab-test-2025-09-29.webp" /></a></p>
<p>So it’s basically right on target, only about 4 % under label, which is fine for peptides without DAC since they can degrade fast if not sealed perfectly.<br />The report said the lyophilized puck looked clean, reconstituted clear, no floating particles.</p>
<p>Peptide Hubs seems to be keeping things consistent lately — nothing crazy overdosed or underdosed.<br />Anyone currently running their No DAC version? I’m curious how people are timing doses since it has such a short half-life.</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://www.azsteroids.net/lab-testing-peptide-hubs">Peptide Hubs</category>                        <dc:creator>xXthehulkXx</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.azsteroids.net/lab-testing-peptide-hubs/cjc-1295-no-dac#post-20090</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		