Notifications
Clear all

Using slin

36 Posts
16 Users
0 Reactions
43 Views
goatfishtwo
(@goatfishtwo)
Active Member
Joined: 8 months ago
Posts: 14
 

Thing is.. with everyone being as big as they are in professional bodybuilding, how much bigger or better can they possibly get? I fear to see it because it seems like now we're really just splitting hairs when placing top 5 in the Olympia.


   
ReplyQuote
(@pieguy)
New Member
Joined: 2 days ago
Posts: 4
 

Posted by: @goatfishtwo

Thing is.. with everyone being as big as they are in professional bodybuilding, how much bigger or better can they possibly get? I fear to see it because it seems like now we're really just splitting hairs when placing top 5 in the Olympia.

Olympia is heavily based on conditioning, symmetry and proportions. If you don't have the right insertion points and don't come in hard as nails and grainy, you won't break top 10 even. I don't see the size of competitors getting too much larger cause the human heart can only take so much. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised from now if a super peptide came out 10 years from now that makes me eat my words.

This post was modified 13 hours ago by admin

   
ReplyQuote
goatfishtwo
(@goatfishtwo)
Active Member
Joined: 8 months ago
Posts: 14
 

Posted by: @pieguy

Olympia is heavily based on conditioning, symmetry and proportions. If you don't have the right insertion points and don't come in hard as nails and grainy, you won't break top 10 even. I don't see the size of competitors getting too much larger cause the human heart can only take so much. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised from now if a super peptide came out 10 years from now that makes me eat my words.

Id actually thoroughly enjoy hearing a discussion amongst the judges about what determines what.

This post was modified 13 hours ago by admin

   
ReplyQuote
(@big-and-swole)
New Member
Joined: 8 months ago
Posts: 2
 

Genetic mutation is next. Scientists have already altered mice at the cellular level to double muscle mass growth. Human trials within a few years.


   
ReplyQuote
RAINier
(@rainier)
Estimable Member
Joined: 8 months ago
Posts: 183
 

Posted by: @goatfishtwo

Id actually thoroughly enjoy hearing a discussion amongst the judges about what determines what.

Pfft... as if the criteria is objective in any way 😉

This post was modified 13 hours ago by admin

   
ReplyQuote
RAINier
(@rainier)
Estimable Member
Joined: 8 months ago
Posts: 183
 

Posted by: @pieguy

Olympia is heavily based on conditioning, symmetry and proportions. If you don't have the right insertion points and don't come in hard as nails and grainy, you won't break top 10 even. I don't see the size of competitors getting too much larger cause the human heart can only take so much. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised from now if a super peptide came out 10 years from now that makes me eat my words.

If it does, I'll stop watching. They're fine how they are now, any bigger is just stupid IMO.

This post was modified 13 hours ago by admin

   
ReplyQuote
Page 3 / 3
Share: